<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Signage Central &#187; press release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/tag/press-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com</link>
	<description>Your source for the latest news from the digital signage industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 05:45:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking of Writing Your Own Digital Signage Software? Read This</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/thinking-of-writing-your-own-digital-signage-software-read-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/thinking-of-writing-your-own-digital-signage-software-read-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Writing Your Own Digital Signage Software? Read This]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WireSpring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the past few weeks, I've run into not one, not two, but three companies who are considering writing their own digital signage software. From scratch. We noted this phenomenon several years ago, when investigating the <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Make_vs_buy__A_pivotal_question_for_kiosks_and_digital_signage_networks-343.html">make-vs-buy question for kiosks and digital signage networks</a>. Frankly, I'm baffled that people are still thinking about writing their own platform here in 2010, given all the mature and affordable software packages that are available today. Without turning this article into a sales pitch, I'd like to talk about some of the arguments that I've heard from the do-it-yourselfers and hopefully set straight some of the widely-held misconceptions about what really goes into creating a digital signage software platform -- or any piece of software, for that matter.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px;font-weight: bold">Better, faster, cheaper. Pick... none?</span><br />
<br />
I don't want to write an article about why you should buy my company's software -- or anyone else's, for that matter. Nor would I ever discount the quality or capability of open source and community-authored software. I use many such programs every day of the week, and they usually rival or top their commercial counterparts. But of the three companies I encountered who were contemplating the make-versus-buy, none are software companies, and two aren't even tech companies of any kind. One has a significant amount of digital signage experience. Another has a more modest track record in the industry. And one is still cutting its teeth on a prototype network. In all three cases, WireSpring's kit is being considered alongside a number of our competitors -- mostly good ones, with a few lackeys thrown in. (Even with over 330 companies in our competitor database, we come across one or two new guys each month.) In each case, cost is being cited as the chief factor in prompting the make-buy decision. In general, the cost-related arguments fall into two categories:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 0px 10px 15px 15px;font-size: 11px;font-style: italic;float: right">
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2443/3858360839_4344f74d9a_m.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #666666;margin-bottom: 5px;width: 240px;height: 160px" /><br />
<div style="text-align: center">Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/dragontomato/">Andrew Michaels</a></div>
</div>
<span style="font-size: 16px;font-weight: bold">Fallacy #1: We can write it ourselves for less than the cost of [<i>X software licenses / Y months of SaaS service / Z firstborn children</i>]</span><br />
<br />
Software companies are <i>businesses</i>, so yes, we do make a point of trying to sell our products to others for money. And while some firms seem adept at gouging customers with sky-high prices, most of us either start out honest, or else we're kept honest by our competitors. Still, there's apparently a notion out there that software development involves no capital expense and has no ongoing support costs. The reality (from my point of view, at least) is that good software developers are <i>expensive.</i> I hate to objectify them like that, because they can be pretty awesome people, too. But awesomeness doesn't show up on my P&#38;L statements. Salaries do. For the cost of even an extremely modest, hypothetical development team -- perhaps 2-3 developers and a QA engineer -- you can buy a <i>lot</i> of software. And that doesn't even figure in tech support or take into account how long it would take said developers and QA folks to build a product that was actually usable.<br />
<br />
Another big misconception -- and I can <i>totally</i> appreciate why anybody who hasn't worked at a software company would think this -- is that once you've written and released your perfect software version 1.0, you can fire your development staff, kick up your heels, and be done with it. I really, really wish that was the case. (Well, except for the firing part -- see the aforementioned note about awesomeness.) But a software program is never really "finished," and even great software demands a considerable amount of expensive, ongoing maintenance. What drives this need for maintenance? Here are a few of the gremlins that are bound to pop up:
&#160;
<ul>
<li><b>Discontinued hardware</b>: The playback hardware you install at your sites (whether it's a PC or an embedded device) will eventually be discontinued and replaced with a new model, forcing you to update the operating system, integrate new drivers and re-test hundreds of scenarios before you can deploy on the new hardware.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Security patches</b>: Mandatory security patches for the underlying operating system (whether it's Windows, Mac OS or Linux) or the other programs you use on there will interfere with your existing playback tools, forcing you to re-write those tools to be compatible. Internet Explorer has been notorious for this, with even a small change in the IE security model requiring major changes to digital signage playback tools that rely on IE for showing any type of web-based content.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>New content formats</b>: Your customers will eventually want to display new content formats that didn't exist when you first wrote your playback software, requiring you to integrate new codecs or upgrade the existing ones.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Browser updates</b>: The web browsers that your employees or customers use to access your management portal (whether it's hosted in-house or out on the cloud) will be updated to new versions, forcing you to update your HTML, Javascript, and other code to be compatible with the new browser releases.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Bug fixes</b>: No matter how much you test before releasing a software product, some number of bugs will crop up once it's in the field -- and it can sometimes take years before a given bug shows up. Like it or not, you'll probably be issuing bug fixes for the life of your product.</li>
</ul>
These scenarios may be specific to the digital signage industry, but the same general issues apply to all software development projects. In fact, companies like Microsoft, Apple, Adobe and Symantec are all <i>constantly</i> updating their legacy products, keeping a veritable army of developers and quality assurance staff employed in the process. But they have millions of clients over which they can spread their costs. When you write your own software, your first, biggest and <i>only</i> client is you. You get to pay 100% of the cost of every new feature and every bug fix. And instead of having a predictable, known cost for what you'll pay every year for keeping things up-to-date, writing your own software means that you bear the entire risk that those endeavors will be more expensive and time consuming than you expected.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px;font-weight: bold">Fallacy #2: We have elaborate, complex and unique requirements that need to be designed from scratch</span><br />
<br />
If you really, really wanted a teal and fuchsia zebra-striped car, would you buy a car and get a custom paint job, or would you get an engineering degree and redesign the internal combustion engine? I have a slightly more diplomatic way of phrasing this when talking to potential customers. But what it boils down to is that when taking a from-scratch DIY software approach, you will be spending time and money solving problems that others have solved already. And I can tell you from experience that even seemingly simple tasks -- like reliably moving a file from server A to player B, or getting said file to play smoothly from beginning to end unattended -- turn out to be pretty complicated when they have to work in the real world, and not just in your development lab.<br />
<br />
At the same time, I understand that all businesses have unique requirements, and some might have enough complexity to warrant writing software to automate (or at least improve) those processes. But in my book, that just calls for a good API and some engineering cleverness. I can't think of many real-world cases that would warrant a rewrite of what is basically the digital signage industry's equivalent of the wheel.<br />
<br />
Perhaps you've done the math and considered salary expenses, time-to-market delays and opportunity costs, and you <i>still</i> think DIY software is a good idea. In that case, you're either planning an extremely huge network with remarkably unique needs, or you're underestimating some part of the DIY proposition. That sounds like a harsh conclusion drawn by a biased party, and maybe it is. But given how many do-it-yourselfers have become our clients and the clients of our competitors over the years, I've noticed a clear trend that goes like this: (1) Meet new prospect doing make-buy analysis. (2) Prospect chooses "make." (3) Wait 2-3 years. (4) Get new call from old prospect looking to retrofit old network. (5) Repeat. This cycle is costly for everyone and ultimately limits the growth of our industry, as otherwise promising network owners spend their time re-inventing the wheel, instead of expanding their networks and creating compelling content that achieves real business goals. Hopefully this article will help some of those people ask the right questions and understand the true costs of writing their own digital signage software, and enable them to make the best technology decision for their business. And if not... Well... I'll see you at step (4) then!<br /><br />   <b><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Thinking_of_Writing_Your_Own_Digital_Signage_Software__Read_This-765.html#comments">Click here to leave a comment</a></b><br />   <br />  <b>What's WireSpring's Blog All About?</b>  WireSpring provides <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/Products/blog-email.html">hardware, software and services for digital signage and kiosk projects</a>. But our blog is a labor of love. Our posts cover everything from case studies to creative briefs, and are authored by some of the industry's most well-respected leaders.   ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/thinking-of-writing-your-own-digital-signage-software-read-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash natively supported in chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/flash-natively-supported-in-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/flash-natively-supported-in-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.risevision.com/digitalsignageblog/index.php/2010/03/31/flash-natively-supported-in-chrome/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well this could make things allot easier when it comes to settling video issues on our Chromium player. Interesting read Chrome brings Flash Player into the fold, trains it to kill iPads? -- Engadget.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/flash-natively-supported-in-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New nutrition labeling requirements could drive growth in digital menu boards</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/new-nutrition-labeling-requirements-could-drive-growth-in-digital-menu-boards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/new-nutrition-labeling-requirements-could-drive-growth-in-digital-menu-boards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sixteen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://sixteen-nine.net/images/wendys_outdoor_presale.jpg" border="0" width="640" height="420" /> </div><div> </div><div>With local authorities raising various stinks about digital billboards and stopping some of those plans in their tracks, it's nice to see some government rules and regs that have the potential to drive growth in this sector.</div><div> </div><div>Myles Mjolsnes of <a href="http://www.wandcorp.com" target="_blank">WAND Corporation</a>, a Minnesota POS vendor that has expanded in to digital signage, sent out a note suggesting the new health care reform passed into law by U.S. Congress last week (and last I checked, the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse did not ride onto the scene when this happened) sets new national standards for nutrition labeling on restaurant menus. </div><div> </div><div><em>The reform will affect all Quick Service Restaurants with 20 or more locations, regardless of ownership,</em> says Mjolsnes.</div><div><br /></div><div><em>QSR franchisees who own only a few locations will still be affected if the total number of brand stores is 20 or greater. By setting one consistent national standard the National Restaurant Association says the new law will help consumers make better choices for themselves and their families. Since details may remain unclear until as late as the end of July the versatility provided by digital displays justifies a solution to replace standard printed menu boards.</em></div><div><em><br /></em></div><div><em>“This is a complex and industry changing event for the entire QSR community,” said Greg Perrill, Chief Operating Officer for WAND Corporation. Caloric and nutrient information will be required on restaurant menus, menu boards, and Drive-Thru displays. WAND Corporation, the global leader in Digital Menu Board and Point Of Sale technology for the QSR space, plans to be a part of the solution process. WAND Corporation’s Digital Menu Boards already handle nutritional information and their dynamic content can be changed or updated instantly. “We foresaw the need for providing customers with nutritional information of menu items and built the feature into our Digital Menu Board technology,” added Perrill. </em></div><div><br /></div><div>You can <a href="http://edlabor.house.gov/blog/2010/03/affordable-health-care-for-ame.shtml" target="_blank">read the 2,016 page bill here</a>, something I'm sure most of you will do right after this ...</div><div> </div><div>I'm not as convinced this will be a major catalyst for more investment into the sector. Nutritional information is no more fluid in its changes than the actual menu items, and could be built in just as easily into revised back-lit material than to digital. This added stuff doesn't demand digital, as far as I can tell.</div><div> </div><div>But what it does do is present a compelling reason to now make the cut-over to digital, something i'd imagine most chain QSRs are looking at anyways. In other words, "The new regs mean we need to change out what's on all of our menu boards. This is as good a time as any to make the digital transition."</div><div> </div><div>WAND, by the way, is tied pretty closely to Wendy's - so a full conversion would be a very big deal with that client.</div><div> </div><div>UPDATE: Austin, TX-based <a href="http://www.starmountsystems.com/products/" target="_blank">Starmount Systems</a> has done up a release about its menu-board capabilities as it relates to this new legislation...</div><div> </div><div><em>Starmount Systems today announced that it will unveil their digital software suite at KioskCom 2010 in a proof-of-concept demonstration for restaurant chains that are facing new requirements to disclose nutrition information to the consumer. The provision in the U.S. health bill passed last week will require all restaurants with 20 or more locations to publish information such as calorie content and sodium levels for all of their menu items.</em></div><div><em><br /></em></div><div><em>“With menus changing on a regular basis, restaurants using static or printed menus face costly updates to fulfill this requirement. Many will be looking at new technology solutions such as digital menu boards and interactive kiosks to address this need,” said Joe Halloum, President and CEO of Starmount. “With Starmount Marquis™, we are proud to offer an easy-to-use, cross-platform software solution that can be implemented today to address the new provisions that are coming two to three years from now.”</em></div><div><em><br /></em></div><div><em> With Starmount Marquis™, we are proud to offer an easy-to-use, cross-platform software solution that can be implemented today to address the new provisions that are coming two to three years from now. Digital menu boards and self-serve kiosks are becoming widely popular in a variety of industries including the restaurant and retail space. Marquis provides an easy interface to assemble, monitor and manage media assets for digital signage and interactive kiosks. It can be tightly integrated with mobile and point-of-sale applications to deliver a complete multi-channel commerce solution. </em></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/new-nutrition-labeling-requirements-could-drive-growth-in-digital-menu-boards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Temporary outage this morning…</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/temporary-outage-this-morning%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/temporary-outage-this-morning%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Menu Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software as a service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.risevision.com/digitalsignageblog/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had an incident today with one of our servers, where we discovered an issue with a database that required our attention ASAP.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/temporary-outage-this-morning%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DSF says it is up past 200 members now; announces board leadership</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/dsf-says-it-is-up-past-200-members-now-announces-board-leadership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/dsf-says-it-is-up-past-200-members-now-announces-board-leadership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Digital Signage Central</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sixteen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>I have my doubts that membership counts are all that telling until real money is being dropped, but nonetheless some 200 companies and individuals have signed on as members of the new <a href="http://www.digitalsignagefederation.org" target="_blank">Digital Signage Federation</a>.</div><div> </div><img src="http://www.digitalsignagefederation.org/Portals/9/DSF_logo-Web.jpg" border="0" hspace="5" width="276" height="115" align="right" /><div>The DSF says memberships are from the US and Canada, as would be expected, but there are also sign-ups from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Czechoslovakia, El Salvador, France, Ghana, India, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Philippines, Russia, Slovenia, Taiwan, the UK, and Vietnam.    </div><div> </div><div>The organization also got some people to stick their hands up and lead the interim board, with Rich Cooley, the CEO &#38; Founder of Visser Digital Media acting as chair, Bob Stowe from Wendy's as Vice Chairman and consultant/industry trainer Alan Brawn as Secretary/Treasurer.</div><div> </div><div>The DSF also now has a lot more shaking on its Website now and Executive Director John Johnson appears to be doing all the meat and potatoes stuff needed for things like bylaws and codes of ethics to make it a real non-profit body.</div><div> </div><div>I remain happily on the fence, watching this play out between the DSF and <a href="http://www.digitalsignageassociation.org" target="_blank">Digital Signage Association</a>. The DSA had 400 plus members when this all bubbled up, and it has been announcing any new members of its own via Twitter. </div><div> </div><div>Meanwhile, the newly re-dubbed <a href="http://www.dp-aa.org" target="_blank">Digital Place-Based Advertising Association</a> now has a splash page that redirects to the older OVAB site. Not great, but better than a placeholder page on Go Daddy pointing to Doberman Pinscher breeders , which was the case last week. </div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/dsf-says-it-is-up-past-200-members-now-announces-board-leadership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muzak &amp; YCD: Evidence of the sales cycle</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/muzak-ycd-evidence-of-the-sales-cycle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/muzak-ycd-evidence-of-the-sales-cycle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sixteen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.prweb.com/prfiles/2008/04/28/534714/gI_0_muzaklogo.jpg" border="0" width="125" height="159" align="right" /><p>I was chained to a booth two years ago at DSE, when three guys wandered up and told me they were from <a href="http://www.muzak.com" target="_blank">Muzak</a> and looking to expand their operations into video. Music they really knew, video ... not so much. </p><p>It was Jon Luther and a couple of consultants.</p><p>A year ago they had a small booth towards the back of DSE, and had just officially announced they were in the game with a Visual Solutions wing, albeit at just about the same moment as they were heading into Chapter 11. I had a retail network client last summer sniffing around about a music and video solution, and spoke with Muzak. They were still, at that point, getting organized, with about 10 people in an office up around Charlotte, NC and plans to be something of an integrator.</p><p>Now two years out, Muzak has done a <a href="http://www.ycdmultimedia.com/index.php/newsletter/article/muzak_chooses_ycd_as_a_vendor_of_digital_signage_products/spring_2010/" target="_blank">partnership</a> with <a href="http://www.ycdmultimedia.com" target="_blank">YCD Multimedia</a>, an Israeli company with a large, growing office in NY. Muzak is effectively a YCD reseller.</p><p>I mention all this for a couple of reasons. It is a great snapshot of the real-world sales cycle in this space. Most deals take for-e-ver to come fully together. I no longer sell stuff, other than my services, but am aware of more than a few software deals that are well into year two now. My last brush with working for someone else involved a couple of guys who concluded, unilaterally, that closing deals in this space was a one-or-two meeting, done in days kinda thing. Nope.</p><p>It happens once in a while, but nope. So if you are new to this sector and expecting things to happen quickly, good luck to you!</p><img src="http://www.artsalliance.com/i/logos/ycd-logo-081808.jpg" border="0" hspace="5" width="137" height="63" align="left" /><p>I mention this, as well, because this is a good deal for all concerned. YCD has a direct background in marketing a full licensed music and video solution, so their platform was likely ready to go out of the box, with limited monkey work to get it all going. And Muzak is now out of Chapter 11 and pretty active. What they have, which should raise eyebrows, is a huge client base and a very solid brand.</p><p>Congratulations to Josh and Noam at YCD and Joe Hall down at Muzak. Looks like a smart partnership and a well suited pairing.</p><p>Side note: YCD does a <a href="http://www.ycdmultimedia.com/html_emails/newsletter/201003/" target="_blank">really nice e-mail newsletter</a>, which is how I learned of this deal. I know <a href="http://www.enqii.com/mailout/Dec09/" target="_blank">EnQii does one</a>, as well, but very few companies in the sector do a client and industry-focused email newsletter. That's a missed opportunity, I think, to let people know what you are up to without it being a merciless sales piece. My guess is a lot of companies would like to but don't have the time or skills. A little shamelessly, I'll just mention I know someone who could do that stuff in his sleep.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/muzak-ycd-evidence-of-the-sales-cycle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Techie Question: How often should you perform maintainance tasks on your digital signage system?</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/techie-question-how-often-should-you-perform-maintainance-tasks-on-your-digital-signage-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/techie-question-how-often-should-you-perform-maintainance-tasks-on-your-digital-signage-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adequate Ventilation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bright Colours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Task]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instruction Manuals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance Tasks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimum Usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reboot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routine Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signage System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smooth Operation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Maintenance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsignageblog.com/?p=2233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Routine maintenance is a critical task for all digital signage operators but how often should you do this and what type of maintenance tasks would you perform?
Some of the maintenance tasks that I could think of are:
Digital Signage Players

Rebooting the digital signage players so that memory and running system files are flushed &#8211; this should [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/techie-question-how-often-should-you-perform-maintainance-tasks-on-your-digital-signage-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next release OS and Browser Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/next-release-os-and-browser-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/next-release-os-and-browser-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.risevision.com/digitalsignageblog/index.php/2010/03/26/next-release-os-and-browser-questions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a lot of questions floating around about our next release, but probably the second biggest one, right after "when will it ship?" is "what's the target OS?".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/next-release-os-and-browser-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where do I download the newest version of the installation program?</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/where-do-i-download-the-newest-version-of-the-installation-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/where-do-i-download-the-newest-version-of-the-installation-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software as a service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.risevision.com/digitalsignageblog/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have noticed with our recent change to the website, we removed the link to download the latest version of the installation file.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/where-do-i-download-the-newest-version-of-the-installation-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Digital Signage Companies</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/small-digital-signage-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/small-digital-signage-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David vs Goliath: Can a Smaller Digital Signage Company Succeed?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WireSpring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'd like to offer up an observation based on nearly a decade of experience in this industry: business as usual hasn't changed much for the small network operator since the turn of the 21st century. For one reason or another, things haven't gotten any easier for companies who manage 100 screens or less. And despite numerous advances in the marketplace, the longevity of a smaller digital signage company doesn't seem to have improved much, either. This baffles me, since in the 5+ years that I've been writing this blog and researching the industry, <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Cost_Estimates_and_Price_Guidelines-672.html">digital signage costs have continued to decline</a>, the quality of the products and services that make up a digital signage network has improved, and people have generally become more accepting (and less incredulous) of the benefits of out-of-home digital media. I haven't completed an exhaustive analysis of the data, but at this point I want to throw out a couple of guesses as to why this might be the case. With your feedback, my goal is to turn this discussion into a more comprehensive study that can benefit network operators of all sizes.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Why focus on the "little" guys?</span><br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 0px 10px 15px 15px; font-size: 11px; font-style: italic; float: right;">
<img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1297/1105686913_af03515eba_m.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #666666; margin-bottom: 5px; width: 180px; height: 240px;" /><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/st3f4n/">Stefan</a></div>
</div>
Before I jump into this, I want to point something out: the digital signage business is probably quite difficult for everybody, large and small. I doubt the execs at industry heavyweights like CBS Outernet and PRN just breeze through their operations without a care in the world. However, there happen to be a lot more small companies in our space than large ones, and I certainly deal with many more small companies on a day-to-day basis. Thus, I have a much larger pool of data to work with there. If anybody from one of the really big networks would like to chime in with a comment or two about their own businesses, all the better. Also, there's nothing magical about the 100 screen or 100 venue cap on my analysis. That just happens to be my mental point for dividing networks into "small" and "large" categories, and is otherwise completely arbitrary. So, don't think that installing just one more screen or venue will catapult you out of the danger zone and into safety.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Those who don't know history...</span><br />
<br />
...are destined to repeat it, as the British philosopher and statesman Edmund Burke noted a few hundred years ago. Sadly, plenty of people in the digital signage industry seem hell-bent on trying to prove him wrong. Very few succeed in this endeavor. One of the biggest sources of angst in our marketplace -- to large and small digital signage companies alike -- continues to be the challenge of justifying the value of the screens (or screen time) to entities that might like to put some content on them. The entity might be an advertiser, a government organization, or a non-profit. But whoever they are, networks owners have to convince them that the audience viewing their screens is valuable. Furthermore, they have to prove that the screens can reach that audience in a meaningful way. As many experienced folks in the industry have said: if you haven't sold ads before, then starting out with <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_signage_networks__Advertising_supported_networks-311.html">advertising-supported digital signage</a> is a very difficult path to take -- and one littered with the corpses of dead networks.<br />
<br />
Clearly, the gung-ho attitudes of new network startups hasn't changed. And while that continues to lend plenty of optimism to the industry, it also means that more companies are charging into the space head-first, often without the understanding of why so many of their peers have failed. Thankfully, I've talked to numerous institutional investors and angel groups recently who've noted they see many fewer "build it and they will come" propositions from network startups, even while the rate of new network formation (from my perspective) seems to be increasing. So my gut feeling is that more companies <b>are</b> testing the waters with smaller, self-funded pilots, and perhaps relying more on organic growth from real, actual revenues.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Wait, I thought this was a cost-driven industry?</span><br />
<br />
Ask any digital signage vendor and they'll say it certainly feels that way sometimes. And as I noted above, costs have steadily declined since we started tracking them in 2004. But that trend only seems to be helping with the <i>rate</i> of new network formation, not the relative success or longevity of those networks. To me, this suggests that the reason for failure has to do with operating costs (or revenue shortfalls) that aren't related to the technology or initial installation expense (which is really all that we track). It might be content, it might be management, or it might be sales. But whatever it is, it's enough to sink network after network. Of course, the upshot for savvy firms is that once a digital signage company goes under, their screens remain in the field, so over time we've seen smaller networks grow inorganically by purchasing the assets of their defunct ex-competitors.<br />
<br />
Obviously, lower costs will continue to reduce entry barriers for prospective network owners. However, just because more companies get started doesn't necessarily mean that more will be successful in the long-term. In fact, I kind of expect the percentage of successful network operators to decrease as more new firms jump in, realize how hard this stuff really is, and then quickly make an exit (or die trying). But on the other hand, more new companies means more innovation, more new and different business models, and hopefully more paths to success. From WireSpring's perspective, we continue to see the strongest growth from new customers starting relatively small networks. But the next biggest growth area is from small- to medium-sized networks expanding their existing operations (which by some accounts is an indicator of their health). For all that, though, there are plenty of networks that have fallen by the wayside.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What's the biggest reason that digital signage networks fail? Is there anything on the horizon that will make things easier for new network operators? Leave a comment and let us know!</span><br /><br />   <b><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/David_vs_Goliath__Can_a_Smaller_Digital_Signage_Company_Succeed_-740.html#comments"   >Click here to leave a comment</a></b><br />   <br />  <b>What's WireSpring's Blog All About?</b>  WireSpring provides <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/Products/blog-email.html">hardware, software and services for digital signage and kiosk projects</a>. But our blog is a labor of love. Our posts cover everything from case studies to creative briefs, and are authored by some of the industry's most well-respected leaders.   ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/small-digital-signage-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Signage Terminology</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-terminology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-terminology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracking the Lingo: How Digital Signage Terminology is Evolving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WireSpring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been going through the results from our last industry poll on what a digital signage network should cost, and I'm planning to publish the results of that study in the near future. In reading the responses, I noticed some interesting differences between the answers given by people who have worked on larger projects, versus those who have predominantly worked on smaller ones. I was obviously expecting to see some differences in terms of what people expected to pay for components, or which services were deemed essential (or not), but even the words used by these people in the course of their open-ended responses differed substantially. This got me thinking about the vocabulary and parlance that I use every day, and how I change it (or don't) depending on who I'm talking to.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Words that need to go away</span><br />
<br />
A few weeks ago, Dave Haynes wrote a <a href="http://pressdooh.com/blog/?p=10">great post on his Buzz, Not Buzzwords blog</a> about some common buzzwords and phrases that really ought to be shelved, at least during <i>polite</i> conversation. ("Best of breed", I'm looking at you.) It's one thing for press releases and marketing documents to use ridiculous phrases -- I think we've all come to expect that by now, and with practice we've learned to more or less ignore them. However, I'm still stunned when people tell me about their n-tiered, next-generation solutions in casual conversation (which also tells you about the kind of "casual" conversation I usually find myself taking part in). In addition to minding Dave's excellent list, I will be doing my best to avoid using the words leverage, dynamic and <b>anything</b> that has to do with synergy. I sincerely hope you'll try to avoid them too :)<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">A sign, by any other name...</span><br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 0px 10px 15px 15px; font-size: 11px; font-style: italic; float: right;">
<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3123/2615811107_25b80425c2_m.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #666666; margin-bottom: 5px; width: 240px; height: 180px;" /><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/andyonflickr/">Andy on Flickr</a></div>
</div>
Long before I started running surveys and taking polls, it was evident that our industry had something of an identity crisis. One man's digital sign was another's electronic display. Captive audience networks were all the rage, until people started realizing that their audiences weren't really captive (aside from those few prison-focused applications). These days, digital out-of-home, or DOOH, seems to have become the de-facto industry acronym, despite the silly sound. But try using that on anybody unfamiliar with the industry -- including those folks who have done their fair share of smaller digital signage projects -- and you'll be greeted with blank stares, funny looks, or worse. Consequently, I stick almost exclusively to "<a href="http://www.wirespring.com/Solutions/digital_signage.html">digital signage</a>" when talking about indoor screens and networks, and "<a href="http://www.wirespring.com/Solutions/electronic_billboards_electronic_signs.html">electronic billboards</a>" when talking about the big, side-of-the-road displays. From what I've seen of the open-ended responses of this last survey, it looks like most of you agree with that approach. I do find myself occasionally using the phrase "digital out of home," but only in the context of advertising, since "out of home" has been used commonly in ad circles for quite some time.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Referring to big networks versus small</span><br />
<br />
In addition to the myriad words and phrases that could be said instead of "digital signage," I started to notice that those respondents who typically worked on <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/David_vs_Goliath__Can_a_Smaller_Digital_Signage_Company_Succeed_-740.html">smaller digital signage projects</a> tended to use different words than those who worked on larger ones. Specifically, the folks from smaller projects more frequently used tech-sounding words like "displays," "screens" and "monitors," while those accustomed to larger projects almost never used such words. This might point to the different mentalities of the companies running each type of project. An AV integrator may have made a successful business out of installing digital screens for messaging in many of the local businesses, churches and schools in his area. But if the projects were heterogeneous and largely self-contained, he probably continued to think of them as technical installations of screens and media players. The function of the screens was ancillary. On the other hand, nobody is going to install a 2,000 screen network unless they have a <b>very</b> clear idea of what those screens will be used for -- and usually that means having some kind of <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Beyond_the_Digital_Signage_RFP__Why_You_Need_a_Content_Strategy-704.html">digital signage content strategy</a>. Consequently, large network deployers frequently used terms like "media" and "network" in their descriptions, which were uncommon in the responses from smaller integrators.<br />
<br />
So while I'll start talking about more substantive results from the survey in the coming weeks, these preliminary, anecdotal findings have taught me that <b>nothing</b> -- including industry parlance -- is a truly settled matter in this business. Part of that is because as we grow, new people and companies from very different markets are getting involved, bringing with them their own perspectives and vocabularies. Plus, some people really just like to throw around marketing schlock, and apparently there's nothing we can do to stop them. I'm hopeful that somebody will eventually figure out how to prevent these people from synergizing their backward overflow dynamics. Until then, I'm leaving my BS filter on.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">The difference in terminology for large and small networks is new and interesting to me. What terms do you use for the kinds/sizes of networks you're most familiar with? Leave a comment below and let us know!</span><br /><br />   <b><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Tracking_the_Lingo__How_Digital_Signage_Terminology_is_Evolving-741.html#comments"   >Click here to leave a comment</a></b><br />   <br />  <b>What's WireSpring's Blog All About?</b>  WireSpring provides <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/Products/blog-email.html">hardware, software and services for digital signage and kiosk projects</a>. But our blog is a labor of love. Our posts cover everything from case studies to creative briefs, and are authored by some of the industry's most well-respected leaders.   ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-terminology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Return on Digital Signage Investment</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/return-on-digital-signage-investment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/return-on-digital-signage-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Investment Advisors Will Show You the Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Investor Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WireSpring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe it or not, there <i>is</i> institutional and angel money available for digital signage companies and networks right now. Unfortunately, the general consensus is that nobody is dying to invest -- in our market or anywhere else -- at the moment. Given this difficult economic climate, investors have become much more cautious about evaluating not just individual opportunities, but the space as a whole. In the course of preparing for our Digital Signage <a href="http://www.strategyinstitute.com/100609_dsic4/dsp.php">Investor Conference</a> in New York next month, I had the opportunity to catch up with several equity fund managers and investment advisors who are all tracking the digital out-of-home market right now. Here are some of the more interesting themes and thoughts that have emerged.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Picking winning networks</span><br />
<br />
"In general, across sectors, there is more scrutiny at the proposed ROI model and testing of the cost and revenue assumptions," said Jeff Milkie, a director at Challenger Capital, an investment bank with offices in Dallas and Chicago. The firm was most recently engaged as an advisor to Indoor Direct's series B funding which totaled $22.5 million. While excitement about the digital signage and digital out of home space remains high, it's a matter of "picking the winners and losers" right now.<br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 0px 10px 15px 15px; font-size: 11px; font-style: italic; float: right;">
<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3099/2318169411_45cc5ef4ef_m.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #666666; margin-bottom: 5px; width: 180px; height: 240px;" /><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/andrein/">Andrei Niemimaki</a></div>
</div>
But what makes for a winning network? A big driver for investors right now is having manageable capital expenditures, given that building out a network is critical. Then it's back to the basics of rolling out the right venue and DMA so the network would be attractive to advertisers. The investment community -- be it venture capital or private equity -- requires that companies seeking funds be able to "hit it up front" and cover all the hot buttons to them, said Milkie.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">A guide to success</span><br />
<br />
Even winning companies can have a hard time raising money. Often, the difficulty lies with the amount of time and effort required to first find the right investors, and then close a deal with them. Hiring an investment advisor is an increasingly common way of accelerating the process. Lon Otremba, CEO of Access 360 Media, successfully completed a series B fundraising in 2008. While the network did not retain an advisor, he does see the benefits in doing so. "Fundraising always takes longer than you plan. It just does. One of the dynamics in any venture backed industry is you're going to have to see a lot of people. It's a very time consuming process. We chose not to retain an advisor to help us through the process mostly because we were introduced to funds through Bessemer (their round A investor). If you have an advisor that can help shoulder the load and help through the process, through time consumption, that's a great thing."<br />
<br />
While an investment advisor does typically charge a retainer as well as collect a percentage of the funds raised, the upside to working with one is similar to working with a real estate agent. The firm is largely compensated based on their success. There is therefore a high incentive to ensure a successful placement. "Having the right advisor will help the company tell the story and connect with the right investors," Challenger's Milkie noted. A good firm can get the introductions made, will know specifically what the investors are looking for and be able to tailor the investment thesis to address the points investors are looking for.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Bill's thoughts</span><br />
<br />
Fundraising is a hot topic for many companies in our industry, and I've previously written about <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/How_to_Raise_Venture_Capital_For_Your_Digital_Signage_Business-695.html">how to raise venture capital for a digital signage business</a> and <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/How_To_Raise_Money_For_Your_Business_During_the_Economic_Crisis-642.html">raising money during an economic crisis</a>. While not every firm will want to hire an investment advisor to assist in the process, having a "winning" business model is something that all companies -- whether they're looking for outside funding or not -- should strive for. That's actually one more thing that a digital signage investment advisor can be a gauge of. Taking a step back, it's no surprise that pitching an individual or angel investor group before chasing after larger, more established equity investor groups can help you refine your <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Crafting_the_Elevator_Pitch_for_Digital_Signage_Companies-713.html">elevator pitch</a> and determine which points are most important to articulate. Similarly, the act of pitching an investment advisor can give you a quick snapshot of how far away from a successful raise you may be. After all, these firms are largely compensated based on successfully raising money for you. If they shy away from working with your company, they might be telling you that your organization lacks the attributes that their investors are looking for. Of course, there may be plenty of other reasons why one particular group or another might not be a good fit: a digital signage investment might fall outside their target industries, or perhaps they prefer to work within a particular geographic area. But testing your pitch against a few groups can potentially provide some valuable insight. I'm aware of at least three different companies that decided to substantially change their business models (almost certainly for the better) after having little success talking to such advisors.<br />
<br />
So if you're going to be in the New York area during the first week of October and are interested in raising money for your digital signage firm, you might want to stop by the Strategy Institute's Digital Signage <a href="http://www.strategyinstitute.com/100609_dsic4/dsp.php">Investor Conference</a>, which takes place on October 6-7. In addition to lots of other entrepreneurs and business owners, you'll find a number of angels, institutional VCs and investment advisors that are already tuned in to our industry, and might be able to lend a helping hand.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Have the capital markets opened up since last year? Are investors tired of hearing about the recession? Leave a comment and let us know!</span><br /><br />   <b><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Investment_Advisors_Will_Show_You_the_Money-742.html#comments"   >Click here to leave a comment</a></b><br />   <br />  <b>What's WireSpring's Blog All About?</b>  WireSpring provides <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/Products/blog-email.html">hardware, software and services for digital signage and kiosk projects</a>. But our blog is a labor of love. Our posts cover everything from case studies to creative briefs, and are authored by some of the industry's most well-respected leaders.   ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/return-on-digital-signage-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Signage LCD and Installation Prices Are Falling: Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-lcd-and-installation-prices-are-falling-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-lcd-and-installation-prices-are-falling-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage LCD and Installation Prices Are Falling: Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WireSpring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For my recent post about <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Tracking_the_Lingo__How_Digital_Signage_Terminology_is_Evolving-741.html">digital signage "lingo"</a>, I performed a very brief and rather unscientific analysis of the data from our survey on <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Survey__How_Much_Should_Digital_Signage_Cost_-732.html">how much digital signage should cost</a>.  Today, I want to start a more in-depth review of those results. There is a LOT of data to go through, and I suspect we'll be poking at these results for at least another few posts, eventually leading to the 2009 edition of our annual <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Cost_Estimates_and_Price_Guidelines-672.html">digital signage cost estimate</a>. So let's start with a straightforward look at what people think the different components of a digital signage network should cost. As a warning, this post has a lot of graphs and charts, so if you're viewing this in your email or RSS reader and can't see the pretty pictures, you might want to visit <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/blog">http://www.wirespring.com/blog</a> to see them in all their glory.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">First, the caveats</span><br />
<br />
Did I say a <i>straightforward</i> look at the data? Surely there's no such thing! For example, while we did get a total of 223 responses to our survey (our best showing yet), some people didn't answer all the questions. Also, we're segmenting the responses by network size (splitting "small" networks from "large" ones at the 100-screen mark to stay true to arguments in previous articles). Some people will disagree with that inflection point. And finally, the data is obviously highly skewed toward existing readers of this blog and there is no control set to compare against.<br />
<br />
With that said, I'd like to present the following graphs, which tabulate the results from people who answered our "what should this part cost?" questions. We'll focus on the hardware and installation components today, and take a look at the software and support components next week. To begin with, we divided the resulting data into four piles (or buckets, if you insist on using ridiculous business jargon): one for people who have never done a digital signage project before, one for people who have only done small projects (1-99 screens), one for people who have only done large projects (100 screens or more), and one for people who have done all sorts of projects, large and small. Even accounting for the caveats listed above, I think you'll agree that the findings are pretty illuminating.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do people expect to pay for a 40" LCD screen?</span><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20090917-wirespring-price_lcd.gif" /><br />
<br />
LCD monitors are the components of a digital signage network that people have the most experience with, since they're used in many applications besides digital signage. From corporate conference rooms to trade show displays to break room TVs, the widespread adoption of LCD displays suggests that people ought to provide the most similar responses for this item, regardless of their individual experiences. However, those reporting no digital signage project experience clearly indicate that they would expect to pay less for a commercial screen than those who have digital signage project experience (whether small projects only, large projects only, or mixed). This may suggest that those unfamiliar with digital signage are accustomed to purchasing consumer grade screens, and aren't aware of the price premium for commercial screens. Or perhaps they simply haven't priced a commercial digital signage LCD screen recently.<br />
<br />
Approximately the same percentage of people expect to pay $1,200 or more per screen regardless of project size (35% of small project only respondents versus 36-38% for large and mixed project respondents). However, fully 1/3 of small project managers feel that $1,000 - $1,200 is the sweet spot right now, whereas those with any larger project experience seem to think they can get a better deal on average. The latter finding makes sense, since that group would be more likely to commit to volume purchases.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do people expect to pay for media player hardware?</span><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20090917-wirespring-price_player.gif" /><br />
<br />
I was really surprised to see how much consistency there was on the media player pricing responses. I was also quite surprised to see how little people expect to pay for these devices. Whereas our 2008 pricing estimates put the average price of a media player at around $1,100, our respondents on average said they expect to pay only about $890. If that data holds up, it would represent a pretty dramatic drop of 19% from last year. Of course, a few different things could be happening here. First of all, the "no project experience" group is skewing the data a bit. Their estimates were the lowest on average (though not by much). Additionally, some people might have been using the survey results to voice what they'd <i>like</i> to pay, and not necessarily what they would actually expect to pay if they were buying these components today. Or, the price of media players could simply have dropped a lot over the past year. That's certainly not out of the question given today's economy and the willingness of many companies to make deals.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do people expect to pay for a tilting wall mount?</span><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20090917-wirespring-price_mount.gif" /><br />
<br />
Like LCD screens, tilting wall mounts are fairly common outside of the digital signage world. However, there is a huge discrepancy in pricing these items between those people who have some digital signage experience and those who don't. Given that those who haven't worked on digital signage projects significantly discounted the price of mounts, the most likely culprit is that this group has either not purchased many (or any) mounts before. Or if they have bought them, they were likely to just head over to Walmart to get the inexpensive consumer ones designed for mounting HDTVs. Those who have done work with digital signage in the past uniformly indicated that the "sweet spot" for mounts right now is the $100 - $200 price range.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do people expect to pay for screen and media player installation?</span><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20090917-wirespring-price_install.gif" /><br />
<br />
The last item we'll discuss today is screen and media player installation. If you believe the data we collected, most people seem to think it doesn't cost a whole lot to install a screen. I wasn't completely surprised to see that those respondents with no digital signage experience would price the expected cost of installation so low -- the average was around $610, with the vast majority indicating "less than $500". If these folks have experience installing big screens, it might be of the do-it-yourself variety, or even a total guess. What was really surprising, though, is how much people <i>with</i> experience said they expected to pay. Our 2008 pricing estimate put the expected cost of a 40" screen and media player installation at around $1100, which was a composite figure that included two laborers (since a 40" screen is heavy enough to require a two-man lift), and a combination of union and non-union cost profiles. However, either we were really off the mark, or prices have fallen significantly, or else this data is totally inaccurate... because the average figure cited by experienced respondents was only $840, which would be nearly a 24% discount over last year's estimates. Granted, the labor market is quite flexible right now, and again thanks to the economy I could certainly see more people making deals just to keep their payrolls current. But it was still quite a surprise to see such uniformity in the data, and such a low resulting average price for digital signage installation costs.<br />
<br />
That's all for now, I'm afraid. Those very mediocre-looking graphs took far too long to make, and while I was hoping to continue this article with discussions of the remaining items (software and tech support), that will have to wait until next week. In the meantime, I'll leave you with a question:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do you think of the results above? Do they fit with your expectations? Leave a comment and let me know.</span><br /><br />   <b><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_LCD_and_Installation_Prices_Are_Falling__Survey-743.html#comments"   >Click here to leave a comment</a></b><br />   <br />  <b>What's WireSpring's Blog All About?</b>  WireSpring provides <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/Products/blog-email.html">hardware, software and services for digital signage and kiosk projects</a>. But our blog is a labor of love. Our posts cover everything from case studies to creative briefs, and are authored by some of the industry's most well-respected leaders.   ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-lcd-and-installation-prices-are-falling-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Signage Software, Management Services Costs Vary: Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-software-management-services-costs-vary-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-software-management-services-costs-vary-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage network management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management Services Costs Vary: Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourced digital signage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WireSpring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised last week, today we're going to continue the analysis of our recent survey on figuring out what a digital signage network should cost. My last article focused on the hardware components that go into a typical project: LCD screens, media players, wall mounts and installation services. (Admittedly, installation isn't hardware, but it does fit nicely with the other items.) Now we're going to look at the various software components that power a digital signage network. Once again, if you're viewing this in your email or RSS reader and can't see the pretty pictures, you should visit <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/blog">http://www.wirespring.com/blog</a> to view the charts in all their glory.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Picking up where we left off</span><br />
<br />
When we left him, our intrepid hero was struggling to figure out how much to pay for all of the bits and pieces that go into a typical digital signage network. Satisfied with the answers he got for the <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_LCD_and_Installation_Prices_Are_Falling__Survey-743.html">digital signage LCDs, media players and installation</a>, he turned his attention towards the hydra that is software and support.<br />
<br />
The key challenge with getting good data on digital signage software and support pricing is that these things are often interrelated, so paying more for one might reduce the cost of the other, for example. Likewise, lots of people have navigated their way through this business using only one software scheme (e.g. self-hosted versus SaaS), and consequently have little experience with other approaches. Because we asked all respondents to give their opinions on both pricing models, this has probably skewed the data a bit. Let's take a look at the responses.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do people expect to pay for media player software?</span><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20090924-wirespring-price_player_software.gif" /><br />
<br />
Unless you're buying some kind of low-power set top box or something equivalently embedded, you're probably going to have the option of buying your media player hardware separately from your software. If not, you could probably at least guesstimate the cost of the two components, since most non-embedded media players tend to be off-the-shelf PCs these days. Consequently, there weren't many surprises from the responses to this question: the free/open source/pirated software people make up a small but stable portion regardless of project size, and everyone else is paying for software packages that span the range from a few hundred to over $1,500 per license. This makes sense to me, since there are a lot of very high-end, feature-rich packages out there that can be used for both small and large projects.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do people expect to pay for remote management software-as-a-service (SaaS)?</span><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20090924-wirespring-price_saas.gif" /><br />
<br />
On the subject of software-as-a-service, I'm still not sure how to interpret the data. For example, do any of the people who have no digital signage project experience (and thus no experience with <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Choosing_the_Best_Digital_Signage_Providers__SaaS_vs_Self_Hosted-729.html">digital signage SaaS</a>), actually have experience using any other types of software as a service? If not, it seems like their guesses would have to be coming out of thin air. Roughly equal numbers of large- and small-project people have never used a SaaS solution, though only 15% of those with mixed experience have never tried SaaS. This suggests to me that many of those noting they have mixed experience are probably pragmatists who use different software for their different products, or perhaps they've inherited some older networks using products different from those that they use today. Those running larger networks definitely expect a larger discount on their SaaS bill than their small- and mixed-project counterparts. On average, those doing small projects exclusively pay about $671/node/year (about $56/node/month), and those doing large projects exclusively pay about $470/year (about $39/month). Those who have done both kinds of projects are right in the middle, saying they pay about $598/node/year on average ($50/node/month). Given the very wide range of prices, I believe that some of these SaaS plans include products and services that aren't included with others. Unfortunately, I didn't ask for that level of detail in the survey, so perhaps some folks can leave a comment and let us know what they get with their SaaS subscriptions.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do people expect to pay for self-hosted remote management software?</span><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20090924-wirespring-price_self_host.gif" /><br />
<br />
Since virtually everyone has experience (or at least some familiarity) with buying boxed software, I don't think the data from the "no project experience" respondents is as suspect as it was for the SaaS question above. Nearly a third of those working exclusively on small projects seem to have gone with either SaaS or (more likely) unmanaged options, whereas that number falls to only about a fifth for those who have worked on large or mixed projects. On a pricing note, one thing that does jump out right away is the huge difference between those who have never done a digital signage project (and have likely not purchased any software for it), and those who have. The "no experience" folks overwhelmingly felt that management software should cost less than $5,000, which is a pretty low number based on my knowledge of today's marketplace. This could be because they simply haven't priced out the market, or it could be because those respondents who have actually read my blog but haven't yet done a digital signage project are studying smaller networks that might eschew formal management software altogether. Otherwise, the numbers for only-small, only-large and mixed experience responses were very close, suggesting that the results here might be a fairly accurate representation of the market. Many server software packages are purchased upfront, before the network reaches a significant installed base, so project size may play a relatively small role in the pricing.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do people expect to pay for technical support?</span><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20090924-wirespring-price_support.gif" /><br />
<br />
Last but certainly not least, we asked people what they expect to pay (or typically pay) for technical support. Phrasing the potential responses to this question was tricky, since many people get support for "free" as part of some other service. Others pay a fixed-fee per managed node. Still others simply pay for the support they use, usually on an hourly or per-incident basis. Because we were basically asking people to condense their experiences into one of a few fixed choices, I'm not as confident in this data as I am with data for the other assets and services studied so far. Still, we can draw some general conclusions. For example, excluding those people who get support as part of their SaaS purchase, project managers are roughly as likely to pre-pay for support annually on a per-node basis as they are to simply pay per-incident, regardless of network size. The number of networks who don't buy any support package at all also seems somewhat steady in the low teens, probably indicating that this portion of projects is handled completely in-house. I'd expect to see this number decline over time -- in lock-step with pricing if past experience is any judge. Finally (and again excluding those who get support with their SaaS service) there is a clear trend toward the lower-end of the pricing scale, both on the per-incident and per-player fee schedules. No big surprises there.<br />
<br />
In my simplified view of the world, the eight components we've studied in the past two weeks -- LCD screens, media player hardware, media player software, screen mounts, self-hosted management software, software as a service, installation and technical support -- are the core elements of virtually every screen network out there. Are there other things that need to be taken into account? Certainly. Bandwidth, video distribution equipment and content creation all spring to mind immediately. However, I've opted not to include those in this survey in hopes of really focusing on the most basic (and static) bits and pieces. With our basic analysis of these costs done, next week we'll turn our attention to the additional services that go along with digital signage: content production, project planning, and about a dozen other elements that we included in our survey. Plus, we'll talk about some of the things that people asked us to include in future studies. Now that you've seen our data on software pricing, I'll ask the same question as last week:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do you think of the results above? Do they fit with your expectations? Leave a comment and let me know.</span><br /><br />   <b><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Software__Management_Services_Costs_Vary__Survey-745.html#comments"   >Click here to leave a comment</a></b><br />   <br />  <b>What's WireSpring's Blog All About?</b>  WireSpring provides <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/Products/blog-email.html">hardware, software and services for digital signage and kiosk projects</a>. But our blog is a labor of love. Our posts cover everything from case studies to creative briefs, and are authored by some of the industry's most well-respected leaders.   ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-software-management-services-costs-vary-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Signage Services Mainly Handled In-House: Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-services-mainly-handled-in-house-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-services-mainly-handled-in-house-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Services Mainly Handled In-House: Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WireSpring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few weeks, we've been studying the results of our digital signage costs survey. As you may recall, we're segmenting the 220+ responses into four groups: those with no experience working on digital signage projects, those with experience working only on small projects, those with experience working only on large projects, and those who have worked on both small and large projects. Thus far, we have examined the data for <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_LCD_and_Installation_Prices_Are_Falling__Survey-743.html">digital signage LCDs, media player hardware and installation</a> and <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Software__Management_Services_Costs_Vary__Survey-745.html">digital signage software, management services and tech support</a>. But there's much more to a running a network than these nuts-and-bolts pieces. Indeed, a wide array of additional services might be needed, ranging from content creation to project management. Today we're going to share more data from our survey respondents concerning the services they deemed essential to making their projects successful. If you're viewing this in your email or RSS reader, you'll probably want to go to <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/blog">http://www.wirespring.com/blog</a> to see the chart with all the survey responses.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">A service by any other name...</span><br />
<br />
<div style="margin: 0px 10px 15px 15px; font-size: 11px; font-style: italic; float: right;">
<img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/75/183842413_271f9a1a86_m.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #666666; margin-bottom: 5px; width: 240px; height: 180px;" /><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/purpleslog/">Purple Slog</a></div>
</div>
While there are plenty of web directories that claim to be a one-stop shop for business services, I've never seen a compendium of definitions for these services and their related providers in one place. Further, because some of them are quite complex, they may be called different things depending on who you ask. To wit, one person's "logistics management" might be another's "roll-out management" and still another's "inventory and shipping management". When putting together the survey, I tried to choose what I felt was the most generic name for each of the services that I've run across while working on a large variety of digital signage networks. Still, the results below may be slightly skewed based on what <i>exactly</i> each person felt the listed services comprised. For that matter, they'll be skewed by what <i>you</i> think they comprise too. Here's what each of the services means to me:
<ol>
<li><b>Logistics Management:</b> Hardware and software inventory control (possibly but not necessarily including purchasing), shipping and receiving management and RMA/warranty management.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Strategy Consulting:</b> Figuring out what the network is responsible for, setting goals and objectives, establishing measurement criteria for determining whether said goals and objectives have been reached, and possibly translating valid business lingo into management gobblygook to get the deal sold.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Project Planning:</b> Developing an itemized to-do list of things that must be done before, during and after each screen is installed, parceling these tasks out to the relevant teams/groups, and making sure each team achieves their goals (and dealing with the fallout when they don't).<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Content Strategy Consulting:</b> Upon figuring out the strategic purpose of the network, figuring out how to make content that will work towards those ultimate goals. May include aspects of content creation, but is often confined to a strategic and then editorial capacity.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Content Production:</b> Making all the pretty content that fills up the screens, and (frequently) cleaning up the not-so-pretty content that other people give you to put on your screens.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Content Management:</b> Assigning the content to the different screens on the network (and different areas on the screen) as appropriate, and then making sure that the content played correctly, at the right dates and times, and in the proper order and proportion.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Network/Operations Management:</b> Once the network is up and running, making sure that the screens continue to function properly, watching for systemic errors, and dealing with the random errors and issues that crop up over time.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Initial Project Management:</b> Some people choose to break out their project management into phases, and have a team dedicated <b>only</b> to the deployment phase. These people are responsible for coordinating site surveys, on-site construction (if needed), installation, shipping/receiving of the various parts that must arrive at each site, and generally making sure that each screen gets installed and turned on according to schedule.<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Ongoing Project Management:</b> For networks that continue to grow over time, these services are very similar to those listed under "initial project management." For those that tend to deploy all-at-once and then stop, the services might look more like those under "network/operations management."<br /><br /></li>
<li><b>Installation Services:</b> The art of hanging screens, running power/network cables, drilling, hammering and otherwise making lots of noise all in the name of getting screens installed and lit.</li>
</ol>
As you can see, even my pre-selected list has some overlap between items. And without the benefit of formal definitions, some respondents may have interpreted these services quite differently than I did. Still, the breakdown of how many people handle each service in-house, outsource it, or don't bother with it is quite interesting. We'll look at the overall results today, and then we'll break them down by project experience in next week's article.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Looking at the overall results</span><br />
<br />
<style type="text/css">
.btable {
	border: 1px solid black;
	border-collapse: collapse;
	}
.thead {
	background-color: #333333;
	color: white;
	font-weight: bold;
	}
.left, .right, .thead {
	border: 1px solid black;
	border-collapse: collapse;
	padding: 5px 15px 5px 5px;
	}
.left {
	background-color: #3366CC;
	color: white;
	font-weight: bold;
	}
.right {
	background-color: #EEEEEE;
	}
</style>
<table class="btable">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="thead">Service</td>
<td class="thead">We do it in-house</td>
<td class="thead">We outsource it</td>
<td class="thead">We don't bother with it</td></tr>
<tr>
<td class="left">Logistics Management</td>
<td class="right">66%</td>
<td class="right">30%</td>
<td class="right">4%</td></tr>
<tr>
<td class="left">Strategy Consulting</td>
<td class="right">86%</td>
<td class="right">10%</td>
<td class="right">4%</td></tr>
<tr>
<td class="left">Project Planning</td>
<td class="right">93%</td>
<td class="right">5%</td>
<td class="right">2%</td></tr>
<tr>
<td class="left">Content Strategy Consulting</td>
<td class="right">74%</td>
<td class="right">23%</td>
<td class="right">3%</td></tr>
<tr>
<td class="left">Content Production</td>
<td class="right">50%</td>
<td class="right">44%</td>
<td class="right">6%</td></tr>
<tr>
<td class="left">Content Management</td>
<td class="right">74%</td>
<td class="right">23%</td>
<td class="right">3%</td></tr>
<tr>
<td class="left">Network/Operations Management</td>
<td class="right">66%</td>
<td class="right">29%</td>
<td class="right">5%</td></tr>
<tr>
<td class="left">Initial Project Management</td>
<td class="right">89%</td>
<td class="right">9%</td>
<td class="right">2%</td></tr>
<tr>
<td class="left">Ongoing Project Management</td>
<td class="right">86%</td>
<td class="right">10%</td>
<td class="right">4%</td></tr>
<tr>
<td class="left">Installation Services</td>
<td class="right">28%</td>
<td class="right">69%</td>
<td class="right">3%</td></tr></tbody></table>
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What do these results mean?</span><br />
<br />
I'm pretty confused by some of the results, and I bet you are too. For example, how can somebody "not bother with" installation services? Is your network in a bunch of boxes in a warehouse somewhere? Likewise, 6% of people opted out of content production. How on earth does that work? I understand that you can do a lot with Twitter and RSS feeds, but seriously, are there really networks out there that don't have <i>any</i> custom content at all? Even throwing the word "Jim" into your "Happy Birthday!" template and hitting "Save" would count in my book. Perhaps that 6% didn't think so.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, I was very pleased to see that only 3% of respondents gave no consideration to content strategy consulting, though a large number still do this in-house (and my bet is that a fair number of those aren't doing a great job). Even just a few years ago, that number would have been much higher. For the most part, people today seem to understand that digital signage isn't just nuts-and-bolts. It's also arts-and-crafts. Along a similar vein, strategy consulting is done by all but 4% of the respondents polled, though again the vast majority (86%) are handling this in-house. While I believe that most of the networks coming out in the last few years are dramatically better than their predecessors, I still feel that a few days (or sometimes even hours) with a <i>bona fide</i> digital signage expert would help virtually everyone undertaking a new project or revamping an old one.<br />
<br />
Not surprisingly, installation was the service most likely to be outsourced. That makes sense, since most people don't have big crews of carpenters, electricians and A/V installers on hand everywhere they want to place a screen. Project planning, which is certainly a very critical element during every stage of a network's life, was the service most likely to be handled in-house. This is probably how it should be -- provided you have some experience doing project planning in-house, that is.<br />
<br />
These results speak volumes about the transition of digital signage from a back-room operation largely handled by AV folks to a kinder, gentler sort of project that is now being approached by people with sales, marketing, corporate communications and other backgrounds. While the variety of people and skill sets can make a digital signage solution a bit challenging to sell (since you have to know your buyer and what his pain points are), it also means more opportunities as the marketplace continues to swell. As I noted earlier, the data I've covered today is just the top-line results from the entire set of 223 respondents. Next week, I'll segment the numbers into our small, large, mixed, and no experience groups to highlight some specific trends. In the meanwhile, I'd certainly appreciate your feedback:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Are there any services missing from my list? If you're a service provider, do you agree with my definitions for the items listed above? Please leave a comment and let me know.</span><br /><br />   <b><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Services_Mainly_Handled_In_House__Survey-746.html#comments"   >Click here to leave a comment</a></b><br />   <br />  <b>What's WireSpring's Blog All About?</b>  WireSpring provides <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/Products/blog-email.html">hardware, software and services for digital signage and kiosk projects</a>. But our blog is a labor of love. Our posts cover everything from case studies to creative briefs, and are authored by some of the industry's most well-respected leaders.   ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-services-mainly-handled-in-house-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Network Size Impacts Digital Signage Service Choices: Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/how-network-size-impacts-digital-signage-service-choices-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/how-network-size-impacts-digital-signage-service-choices-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How Network Size Impacts Digital Signage Service Choices: Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourced digital signage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WireSpring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week we looked at a list of digital signage services to find out which tasks companies tend to outsource, versus handle internally. Today, I'll break down that survey data based on network size, looking at how those with small network experience, large network experience, mixed experience and no experience responded to the questions. This data could be valuable for service providers who are trying to decide which companies to market to. Likewise, it could be useful to network owners and operators as a way of comparing their decisions to similar (but potentially competing) companies. We've got a lot of graphs and charts in today's article, so once again if they're not showing up correctly for you (e.g. in your email inbox or your RSS reader), surf on over to <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/blog">http://www.wirespring.com/blog</a> to get a better look.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">So, how do big and small digital signage networks handle their service needs?</span><br />
<br />
If you missed <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Services_Mainly_Handled_In_House__Survey-746.html">last week's article on digital signage services</a>, you might want to give it a quick read-through, since it presents some top-line findings that we'll be exploring in more depth today. Let me point out one quick thing before diving into the results: there are some slight numerical differences in the results between this week and last, due to rounding errors in Excel and a peculiarity with how the spreadsheet treats blank values in certain formulas. For the most part, these errors are small (less than 3% or so), and in any event they don't change the high-level findings or analysis presented in last week's article. With that out of the way, let's take a look at the charts for each type of digital signage service:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091008-wirespring-q1.gif" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091008-wirespring-q2.gif" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091008-wirespring-q3.gif" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091008-wirespring-q4.gif" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091008-wirespring-q5.gif" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091008-wirespring-q6.gif" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091008-wirespring-q7.gif" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091008-wirespring-q8.gif" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091008-wirespring-q9.gif" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091008-wirespring-q10.gif" /><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Digging into the numbers</span><br />
<br />
As you can see, there really isn't much variance in the responses from each of the experience groups, which I found quite surprising. After all, a 10,000 screen, 500-venue advertising network is quite different from, say, a 2-screen employee breakroom application. I was really expecting to see more distinction between those with only-large and only-small network experience, but those variances simply didn't show up. Understandably, the group who admitted to having no experience working with digital signage <em>did</em> tend to have different answers than the folks who have done projects before. Whether this indicates a lack of understanding of the marketplace or just a different set of expectations based on some domain-specific knowledge is hard to say. Most of the time, though, even the no-experience people were within a few percentage points of those with some experience under their belts.<br />
<br />
However, there were a few areas where the groups displayed more diversity in their responses:
<ul>
<li>Nearly 80% of those working with large digital signage networks handle their content management in-house, versus 74% of small networks and 70% of those who have done both.<br /><br /></li>
<li>Those respondents who had only worked on large network projects were slightly more likely to outsource their project planning (11%), versus just 3.5% of those who had only worked on small network projects.<br /><br /></li>
<li>Likewise, those handling large and mixed projects were more likely to outsource logistics management (35%), versus only 21% of those working exclusively on small network projects.<br /><br /></li>
<li>While those with both large and small network experience generally tended to answer more similarly to those with large network experience only, one exception is in the network/operations area. Those with mixed experience were markedly more likely to take care of that service in-house (76%), versus just 63% of those exclusively working on large projects, and 64% of those exclusively working on small projects.<br /><br /></li>
<li>Not surprisingly, small network managers were significantly more likely to handle installation services themselves (though it was still only 30% of them). Only 20% of large network managers handled such tasks in-house. Those with mixed experience were split between these two at about 24%.</li>
</ul>
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Things to cover in future surveys</span><br />
<br />
While I got a lot of positive feedback about this survey and its content in general, there were a few common themes in the suggestions that I received. For example, many people asked for a greater focus on content-related costs, including typical production costs, rework costs, and the like. Another popular area of focus was on hardware, with numerous folks asking for a study of pricing for components like directional audio systems, cellular modems and plans, and measurement peripherals. Still another group wanted a look at more business-y items like equipment financing and leasing, costs associated with customer attrition, and related site fees. And then there was one guy who said "Monkeys. Lots of monkeys. And pie."<br />
<br />
I'm not quite sure how I can help that last respondent (except perhaps to recommend that he check the dosage of his medication), but for the rest of you folks with requests, I'll certainly begin planning some future surveys to cover these important matters. There's clearly still a lot of confusion and complexity in our market, thanks to both the variety of skills that must be brought to the table, and the wide range of corporate disciplines that have attempted to take on digital signage projects. My goal for future surveys is to continue bringing the relevant data into the open, which should help increase confidence among potential customers and increase the size of the pie for everyone.<br />
<br />
Well, I'm finished studying this data for a while, but it certainly has been an educational set of articles (for me, at least). As many of you have been asking, yes, an update to our annual <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Cost_Estimates_and_Price_Guidelines-672.html">digital signage cost estimate</a> is coming up soon -- either later in October or early in November. To compile the annual budget numbers, I definitely plan to use the data from this pricing survey in conjunction with my usual method of gathering industry-wide pricing (which largely consists of emailing and calling a lot of people). But thanks again to everyone who filled out the survey and left comments during the past few articles. I've learned quite a bit from the experience, and hopefully you have, too.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Did you enjoy the way we published the survey results? Would you like to see them presented in the form of a downloadable report, a slide presentation, a video, or a podcast? Leave a comment and let us know.</span><br /><br />   <b><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/How_Network_Size_Impacts_Digital_Signage_Service_Choices__Survey-747.html#comments"   >Click here to leave a comment</a></b><br />   <br />  <b>What's WireSpring's Blog All About?</b>  WireSpring provides <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/Products/blog-email.html">hardware, software and services for digital signage and kiosk projects</a>. But our blog is a labor of love. Our posts cover everything from case studies to creative briefs, and are authored by some of the industry's most well-respected leaders.   ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/how-network-size-impacts-digital-signage-service-choices-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2009 Digital Signage Pricing Study: Costs Have Fallen 23%</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/the-2009-digital-signage-pricing-study-costs-have-fallen-23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/the-2009-digital-signage-pricing-study-costs-have-fallen-23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commoditization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital connectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage congtent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage connectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage pricing study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Signage ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The 2009 Digital Signage Pricing Study: Costs Have Fallen 23%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WireSpring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five years ago, we started a tradition that -- much to our surprise -- led to industry notoriety as well as more fans and flames than you can count. Yes, that's right, I'm talking about the annual digital signage pricing guide. As the number of articles on this blog started to become unwieldy, we decided to create a single page with all the <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Cost_Estimates_and_Price_Guidelines-672.html">digital signage cost estimates and price guidelines</a> that we've published over time. This year, we're introducing a brand new feature: the pricing study will incorporate some of the data collected from our "How Much Should Digital Signage Cost?" survey, which we analyzed in a series of recent blog articles. As you'll see from the results below, digital signage has never been more affordable or more available than it is today. So what are you waiting for? Keep reading to find out just what it'll take to get you into your very own 100-screen network today!<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">A quick review and introduction</span><br />
<br />
For those new to the market (and those who've read these articles before but have forgotten), the numbers below are meant to model a "typical" 100-screen network. What does that mean? I think this paragraph from last year's writeup still says it well:
<blockquote><i>
While our previous cost estimates and ecosystem components have closely matched those from other industry analysts (so we don't think we're too far off the mark), the myth of a "typical" network is more strained this year than ever before. More vendors and network owners are choosing to implement screens with new formats and more varied locations, injecting more diversity into the projects. Plus, the idea that there's a standard staffing requirement for any digital signage network is pretty ridiculous.  While we and others have proposed a list of key positions that need to be filled when creating a digital signage team, some networks are still very heavy on content production, while others might be composed almost entirely of sales folks.  Still, as we looked across a wide array of networks -- representing not just our products but also our competitors' solutions -- we were able to get a reasonable feel for what most companies needed as far as the human resources side of things.
</i></blockquote>
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What's the cost of a typical 100-screen digital signage network?</span><br />
<br />
Despite the many variables that go along with this type of broad estimate, we found that the data we compiled internally -- combined with the survey results that many of you contributed a few months ago -- paint a very logical picture. More importantly, the pricing continues to follow the well-defined trend that we've observed for several years now. The resulting cost estimates appear in the table below. (If you're viewing this in your email or RSS reader and can't see the tables and charts, we encourage you to visit <a href="http://www.wirespring.com/blog">http://www.wirespring.com/blog</a> to get the full experience.)<br />
<br />
<table style="border: 1px solid black; padding: 0px; background-color: white;" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-bottom: 1px solid black; padding: 5px; font-weight: bold; color: white; background-color: #3366CC;" colspan="2">
Cost of a digital sign for 3 years</td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;">40" LCD screen</td>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;" align="right">$800</td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;">Player hardware</td>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;" align="right">$775</td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;">Display mount</td>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;" align="right">$110</td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;">Player software</td>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;" align="right">$405</td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;">Management software &#38; tech support</td>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;" align="right">$1,300</td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;">Installation</td>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;" align="right">$740</td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-bottom: 1px solid black; padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;">Initial project management</td>
<td style="border-bottom: 1px solid black; padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;" align="right">$225</td></tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;">Total</td>
<td style="padding: 5px; font-weight: bold;" align="right">$4,355</td></tr></tbody></table>
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">How have things changed since our last pricing study?</span><br />
<br />
Right off the bat, you can see the dramatic decline in pricing, which we attribute to the confluence of a few things. First, and most obviously, the broad macroeconomic trends that we've all been experiencing the last 12 months or so have made ours an even more dog-eat-dog world than usual. With slower than normal deal flow and a more cautious customer base, many providers have felt compelled to slash prices in order to keep the deals moving. Stemming from this, several of the better-known vendors in our industry have experienced some pain (e.g. running out of working capital, having major investors withhold cash payments, trying to get bought/sold, etc.), and have consequently tried some... um... creative pricing strategies in an attempt to keep their heads above water. And finally, the tireless march of progress (aided by low or negative inflation rates) has simply made some of this stuff cheaper, as it almost always does. Interestingly, looking at the breakdown of costs by component, you can really see the effect of the commoditization of the hardware:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091028-wirespring-costs01.gif" /><br />
<br />
Hardware items are taking up less and less of the pie, while the service-oriented components like management software and tech support take up larger portions. While I don't think we've seen the end of this trend yet, it's clear that those service areas are where the true value to the customer lies, so it's no wonder that they're getting bigger at the expense of the mere "nuts and bolts." The upshot to you, gentle reader, is that there has never been a better time to get into the digital signage business as a network owner or operator -- provided you have the working capital, at least.<br />
<br />
As you can see in the tables below, <b>the cost of implementing a 100-screen network has dropped nearly 23% in the past year and nearly 50% since 2004</b>, which is the biggest annual decline that we've recorded since we started keeping track. (Note: to ensure an accurate comparison, we removed the 24/7 tech support line from the 2004 numbers, since this was not included in subsequent years.)<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091028-wirespring-costs02.gif" /><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.wirespring.com/weblog/uploads/20091028-wirespring-costs03.gif" /><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What happens when you consider personnel costs?</span><br />
<br />
As noted, the table above is a composite estimate for running a 100-screen network over the course of 3 years. Building on work that we did last year to figure out the approximate cost (including personnel) for running such a network, we've re-verified that the "average" 100-screen network takes somewhere between 7 and 15 people to run. We stuck with the assumption that the average salary for these personnel is $50K (which is fair, since average salaries haven't dropped that much in the past 12 months). But we reduced the average staff size by one person (to reflect the dismal state of employment today), bringing the average headcount to 9 people. This adds up to another $450,000 in salaries and associated costs every year, for a total of $1.35M over our 3-year planning horizon. That's equivalent to $37,500/month in expenses, or $375/screen/month. When added to the $121/month in capital expenses, <b>the "average" screen in a "typical" 100-screen network costs about $496/month after salaries are factored in</b>. In other words, <b>a 100-screen network would need to pull in just under $50,000/month to break even.</b><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">What about connectivity and content?</span><br />
<br />
First, connectivity. To the people who tell me year in and year out that I need to include bandwidth and connectivity costs in my estimates, I once again went out to the masses and asked. Aside from a couple of interesting exceptions, most networks are still sharing the bandwidth that's already in place at their host venues, essentially getting Internet connectivity for free. So while connectivity could easily add another $30-$150/month in expenses to your network if you need to spring for it, in my experience this will be the exception, not the norm. And with airports, malls, superstores and coffee shops giving away free bandwidth to anybody with a wireless adapter, I really don't expect that to change. I know a lot of people are waiting for WiMax to really start making headroads in the market, but today we're still stuck with 3G at best, and 2.5G or worse in areas with poor coverage. So cellular connectivity doesn't really save anything versus wiring into an existing LAN or using WiFi today.<br />
<br />
Next, content. In 2007, we took a look at some of the content creation costs that go along with digital signage networks and found them to be all over the map. Since then, content gurus like Pat Hellberg and Gary Halpin have chimed in with explanations of why certain things cost what they do. But during that period, nobody has really ventured forward with a formula for guesstimating the a la carte content production costs. The good news is that the prices in our 2007 budgeting article have likely fallen, thanks largely to the lousy economy, low inflation, greater competition, improved workflow processes, and offshoring. The even better news is that since last year's budgeting article, I discovered that every single network I spoke to has at least one in-house content person who handles some (or nearly all) of the network's content needs. Consequently, at least part of the content creation budget is already built-in to my estimates above.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Closing thoughts (and some more light reading)</span><br />
<br />
So there you have it, the 2009 digital signage pricing estimate. After speaking with a bunch of networks directly and incorporating the data that we culled from the 220+ responses to our pricing survey, I'm more confident of the numbers above than ever before. Want more info on the survey results that informed our final pricing numbers? Check out our recent articles where we looked at each category in detail:
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_LCD_and_Installation_Prices_Are_Falling__Survey-743.html">Digital Signage LCD and Installation Prices Are Falling</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Software__Management_Services_Costs_Vary__Survey-745.html">Digital Signage Software, Management Services Costs Vary</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/Digital_Signage_Services_Mainly_Handled_In_House__Survey-746.html">Digital Signage Services Mainly Handled In-House</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/How_Network_Size_Impacts_Digital_Signage_Service_Choices__Survey-747.html">How Network Size Impacts Digital Signage Service Choices</a></li>
</ul>
Of course, even with all my number-crunching, I don't claim this data is perfect. That's why I hope you'll chime in with your own thoughts and experiences. So...<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold;">Are you surprised by the big drop in costs this year? Do our numbers match up with your own experiences on the open market? Leave your thoughts in a comment below!</span><br /><br />   <b><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/articles/The_2009_Digital_Signage_Pricing_Study__Costs_Have_Fallen_23_-749.html#comments"   >Click here to leave a comment</a></b><br />   <br />  <b>What's WireSpring's Blog All About?</b>  WireSpring provides <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wirespring.com/Products/blog-email.html">hardware, software and services for digital signage and kiosk projects</a>. But our blog is a labor of love. Our posts cover everything from case studies to creative briefs, and are authored by some of the industry's most well-respected leaders.   ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/the-2009-digital-signage-pricing-study-costs-have-fallen-23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Signage Installation: Metropolitan Community College</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-installation-metropolitan-community-college/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-installation-metropolitan-community-college/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software as a service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.risevision.com/digitalsignageblog/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rise Display recently completed phase II of an installation for the Maple Woods campus at Metropolitan Community College in Kansas City utilizing Display Wire, their private labeled brand name for our Rise Vision Display Network - a web service for digital signage management.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-installation-metropolitan-community-college/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.risevision.com/digitalsignageblog/wp-content/uploads/maple_woods_003_medium-300x225.jpg" length="10480" type="image/jpg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Signage and Zurich clubbing scene – Moods Example</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-and-zurich-clubbing-scene-%e2%80%93-moods-example/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-and-zurich-clubbing-scene-%e2%80%93-moods-example/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital out-of-home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital signage trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zurich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  The latest noted trend on the Zurich clubbing scene is introduction of new media into the customizable, usually limited club space.    If we take Moods, the first address for jazz events in Zurich, as one of the examples for the trend, we can notice ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/digital-signage-and-zurich-clubbing-scene-%e2%80%93-moods-example/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snappies from the Christie MicroTiles launch</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/snappies-from-the-christie-microtiles-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/snappies-from-the-christie-microtiles-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aggregator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brochure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sixteen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.microtiles.com" target="_blank">Christie Digital</a> took over a nightclub in New York last night and formally launched its MicroTiles products, with the event hosted by fellow blogger Adrian Cotterill of DailyDOOH fame.</p><p>This was the second time I have seen the gear and was impressed once again, this time by the scale. Bob Rushby (below), one of the inventors of the tiled displays, showed off a wall of tiles that was 16 wide and 6 high (96 tiles) that amounted to (I think he said) a 37 million pixel image. It was some crazy-big number like that.</p><p>The Christie folks also showed some other new designs and more content, including a huge display suspended at an angle and meant to emulate a 16-sheet out of home poster shape. </p><p>Impressive stuff, and good event. Lots of familiar faces there, as well as a lot of people from the AV industry who will be all over this. </p><p>(Disclaimer: I do some work for Christie, but I'd like it no matter the ties) </p><p>&#160;</p><p><img src="http://sixteen-nine.net/images/christie-dec2.jpg" border="0" width="640" height="372" /></p><p>&#160;</p><p><img src="http://sixteen-nine.net/images/christie-dec1.jpg" border="0" width="640" height="784" /> </p><p><img src="http://sixteen-nine.net/images/christie-dec3.jpg" border="0" width="640" height="853" /> </p><p>&#160;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsignagecentral.com/news/snappies-from-the-christie-microtiles-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.791 seconds -->
